Technical library

Core setters for aerospace and IGT:
better thermal conditions, lower process costs

A summary of the 2019 Blasch paper that continues the stress analysis of ceramic core setters and asks what it costs to get them wrong.

The first paper asked where a setter is stressed.
The second asks what the firing conditions cost the plant.

Ceramic crucibles for investment casting
In short

This Blasch white paper from 2019 extends the earlier stress analysis of ceramic core setters for aerospace and industrial gas turbine (IGT) castings. It looks at the thermal conditions a setter sees during core firing and at how setter design and material can lower the process costs that come from setters that slump, crack or have to be replaced early.

About the paper

Item Detail
Title Improving Thermal Conditions and Reducing Process Costs for Core Setters in Aerospace and IGT Applications
Type White paper, presented at the 66th Investment Casting Institute Technical Conference, October 2019
Authors Phil Geers, Senior Market Manager Molten Metals; William Russell; Dave Bacchi, Blasch Precision Ceramics

Where the cost sits

A core setter is not part of the casting, but it decides whether the core that goes into the shell is the core that was designed. Every setter that deforms or cracks costs twice: once as a replacement part and once as cores that are out of tolerance, found only further down the casting line.

Blades and vanes for aerospace engines and industrial gas turbines carry complex cores, and the plants that make them are pushed to fire faster. Faster heat up and cool down means more thermal shock on the setter in every cycle.

What the paper builds on

The 2018 paper used finite element analysis to compare stresses in a setter in different orientations and to find the orientation with the lowest stress. The 2019 paper takes that analysis further, toward the thermal conditions in firing and the cost side of the process, as the title says.

The detailed findings, figures and any cost estimates are in the full paper, which is available on request.

The cheaper setter

The setter with the lower price is not the cheaper one if it changes shape before the cores it carries do.

What to look at in your own core firing

Three questions decide whether a setter is a cost line or a non issue:

  • How many firings does a setter survive before it slumps, moves or cracks?
  • How many cores are rejected for dimensions, and how many of those trace back to the setter?
  • Has the firing cycle become faster since the setter was specified?

Blasch casts ceramic core setters with geometry that follows the core, to tight tolerances and in several high purity grades, and tests strength, density, thermal shock and creep deflection in its own laboratory. The first core setter paper explains the stress analysis this work starts from, and the molten metals overview shows the other parts Blasch makes for investment casting plants.

Frequently asked

Questions about the paper

What does IGT mean in the title?

Industrial gas turbines. Their blades and vanes are investment cast with ceramic cores, as in aerospace, often at larger sizes.

Does the page give the cost savings?

No. The figures are in the full paper. Request it and a Blasch engineer sends it with the earlier paper.

How is this paper different from the 2018 one?

The 2018 paper analyzes stresses and setter orientation. The 2019 paper continues that work toward firing conditions and process costs.

Which tests does Blasch run on setter materials?

Modulus of rupture, Archimedes density, thermal shock resistance, creep deflection, corrosion and wear resistance, in the Blasch laboratory in Albany.

Counting the cost of setters
in your core line?

Send the core type, the firing cycle and how often setters are replaced. A Blasch engineer reviews material, geometry and orientation.

Talk to an engineer Call