About the paper
| Item |
Detail |
| Title |
Effects and Analysis of Thermal Stresses on Large Induction Furnace Refractory Linings for Molten Metal Applications |
| Type |
Technical paper, Blasch Precision Ceramics, Albany, New York |
| Year |
2016 |
| Authors |
P. Geers, Market Manager Molten Metals; W. Russell, Application Engineer |
The problem: a steep gradient in a thin wall
A coreless induction furnace heats the charge from the inside through eddy currents, while a water cooled coil keeps the outside of the lining cold. For many aerospace alloys the melt sits around 1,600 °C. The result is a large temperature difference across a few inches of refractory, and that gradient is what holds the metal back. It is also what loads the lining with strain.
The authors point out that the problem grows with size. Furnaces from about 500 kg capacity upward see a clearly higher tendency to fail from these compounding stresses.
How the linings were compared
The paper models a 3 ton lining as a cylinder fixed at the bottom. As it heats, the lining grows upward, by as much as 7 mm in height for an alumina or MgO based material, and the inner diameter expands more than the outer one. That puts the hot face in compression and the outer surface in tension.
Three constructions were then run through the same finite element model with identical inputs: a monolithic rammed lining, a mortared brick lining and a segmented brick lining. The only variable was the construction. Stress was compared as von Mises stress, which the authors use for comparison rather than as an exact failure value.
What the analysis showed
Rammed lining: the inner face carries higher stress than the outer face, which weakens grain boundaries and leads to cracks through the lining.
Mortared brick: peak stress on the inner face is similar to the rammed lining, because the bricks act as one body until the mortar, the weakest part, gives way.
Segmented, mortar free lining: each brick has expansion gaps sized for the different growth of inner and outer face. The gaps close as the lining heats, and the overall stress stays much lower than in the other two. On cooling, the segments shrink back to their original size.
Cracks in a one piece lining also feed themselves. When the furnace cools, metal runs into the cracks, and on the next heat the trapped metal expands and opens them further.